Minister | Media Guru | Renaissance Man

Buckhead Church

Had the opportunity to visit Buckhead Church in Atlanta this weekend. Buckhead is a satellite campus of North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, GA pastored by Andy Stanley.

My first impression of Buckhead was that it was a young, hip, and well-off crowd. Everyone fit the metrosexual profile and for the first time in a long time it felt like I was back in Dallas. This church is inarguably young and single… and I was impressed. I felt a bit out of place from these GenX’ers (even though I minister to them in my own church). But it was a good feeling, having more to do with the amazing fact that the church’s demographic was so young (and so single). It felt REAL good in that respect. Most churches are not reaching these people and don’t care much about them.

The music and tech was much like Fellowship Church in Dallas. That shouldn’t surprise anyone who knows the strong connection that North Point (Buckhead) and Fellowship maintain. It reinforced my growing understanding that there are two very different philosophies in play concerning church worship.

Participational verses Presentational.

Churches of the past (and many today) operate under the prevailing wisdom that what people want out of church is community, an intimate experience with other people and with God. They want to see others experiencing authentic worship and learn to participate with them. In these churches the voices will rise above the music, you’ll be able to hear those around you singing, and the congregation will be continually prodded toward participation. Singing, clapping, and smiling are placed at a premium

Presentational churches are all about the show. OK, not really, but that’s what the opposition says. In all actuality, what presentational churches believe is that worship is not really about worshiping community with others as much as it is connecting in worship with God. In these churches the music will most likely drown out the people around you. You might be singing at the top of your lungs but no one hears you, but yourself and God. Participation is encouraged, but not necessarily seen as critical… at least, singing and clapping as not seen as critical. In these churches you’ll find low lighting, in-your-face sound levels, and typical a high level of visual creativity.

I am becoming more and more convinced that these divergent methodologies for approaching worship as much to with age as they do with Biblical mandate. A case can be made for both side’s rightness, I believe. And I think that they both have their merits. But this is one of the new ‘battlegrounds’ in churches and the lines are being drawn mostly by age. You tell me why?!

In any case, Buckhead is Presentational in nature… as is Fellowship… as are many churches popping up around the country.

Beyond that, there isn’t much left to say about Buckhead. It seems to have a vibrant community, is wildly growing, and is poised to become a successful plant. My only remaining question involves just that: It’s a plant. And try as I might to ease my comfort level concerning ‘satellite’ churches, I’ve as of yet been unable to do so. That is another post for another day. But I am wary of this method of church planting over the old way. I am wary of mega-churches crowding out local churches. I am wary of ‘branding’ and the part it plays in satellite growth. Are these churches not the Wal-Mart’s of Christendom? But that is a discussion for another time. There are also very many positive things that come from planting satellite campuses.

And I imagine that one day, irony being what it is, I’ll be pastoring a church that has satellite campuses. I guarantee though, if that day comes, I’ll still be asking these questions… and a bunch more that you haven’t ever thought of (but I already struggle with). ;)

5 Responses to “Buckhead Church”

  1. Craig Magrum says:

    Some good points there Kevin, of which I have to agree. I’m concerned myself about the "branding" that seems to be happening…Willowcreek, etc. Though, isn’t that really how ALL denominations have grown? People from one community of believers goes out, and establishes another church in a different community that reflects the values and beliefs of the parent church? Perhaps the difference is just the quality of the message. To me, it almost seems like there is a shallowness/trendiness in these newer "church plants" that is based more on cultural presentation, rather than substance of the Gospel, and a demonstration of the Spirit’s Power (as Paul was primarily concerned with.) I just don’t see a lot of "power" in today’s churches…and that includes even the more "traditional" churches. (And even some of the "Pentecostal" churches…)

  2. Dave Marks says:

    I go back to the old chestnut "We catch them, God cleans them" Yes, the presentational church plants may seem "artificial", but I believe we can’t judge them unless we spend some serious face time inside a plant. A distinct personality emerges out of each of these church plants, whether it’s community built out of a shared neighhborhood, or a defining moment that serves as a milestone, that set the church plant apart from the mother church. I’ve wandered into some of these places wondering "What’s drawing people here?’ If I sit still and listen, the conversations around me tend to revolve around what makes this church special to the people.
    On the flip side, there are one or two places that I have left wondering, "Why are people coming here?" and the only answer I can find is a high entertainment factor.
    And remember, these church plants would not be necessary if the local churches were doing the job they were commissioned to do!

  3. DB says:

    dude, you go to buckhead and don’t let me know.
    Hello! — right down i-20 :)

  4. Gary says:

    Great thoughts.

  5. p says:

    i can’t wait for you to post about satellite churches, i’ve got some great questions for you to handle!

    in the meantime, there is a huge genreation gap when it comes to presentational vs. participatory. think about it, the younger generation is used to watching stuff, where as, the older generation is used to doing stuff.

    God for the younger generation is about entertaining our thoughts and minds at a deeper level than what we experience now. God for the older generation is about…something….i’m not sure…maybe being brought along for the ride? participating in what God is doing?

    Neither viewpoint to its extreme is good. a full and abundant life is not about one aspect of God. it’s about experiencing all aspects within one lifetime. He can and will permeate those aspects, but how people will let Him in is the difference. no one way is more right than another, you just better be speaking the language of the people you’re trying to reach, otherwise, all they will hear is blah, blah, blah.

    a great church will "hook" people with one aspect, then bring them into a community, and have them expereince God on many different levels.

    buckhead is doing that well. Godspeed Northpoint and Buckhead! we salute you!

Leave a Reply