MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_NextPart_01C54601.2EE8D690" This document is a Single File Web Page, also known as a Web Archive file. If you are seeing this message, your browser or editor doesn't support Web Archive files. Please download a browser that supports Web Archive, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer. ------=_NextPart_01C54601.2EE8D690 Content-Location: file:///C:/98E9D510/CouncilPrep.htm Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Kevin
Matthew Young
Preparation for Ordination Examining Council
This document is in p=
rocess
of being prepared for my own benefit, in hopes of sharpening my own doctrin=
al
skill and in preparation of the Examining Council. It will be updated regularly over =
the
next several weeks (generally on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays).
These answers are not=
in any
way meant to be exhaustive or final explanations on their respective
topics. Libraries have been
dedicated to answering some of these questions. Please consider these answers the
‘tip of the theological iceberg.’ Further study would be required for
anyone serious enough about these questions to formulate their own answers.=
If you disagree or ha=
ve
questions or comments, please contact me directly or post your thoughts on =
the MediaFORUM.
1)
PERSONAL HISTORY (this section will be finished last)=
i>
a)&n= bsp; Briefly describe your religious background.
b)&n= bsp; What events led to your conversion experience?
c)&n= bsp; Name several evidences of your salvation.
d)&n= bsp; How and when were you baptized?
e)&n= bsp; Where do you hold current church membership?
f)&n= bsp; Relate any subsequent spiritual experience you have= had since your conversion.
g)&n= bsp; What is your personal pattern of prayer and Bible study?
h)&n= bsp; What particular gift(s) do you feel God has given y= ou?
i)&n= bsp; How are you using those gifts?
j)&n= bsp; Relate your experience in determining “God’s call” to the Gospel ministry.
k)&n= bsp; What blessing or fruit has resulted from your minis= try?
2)
HOLY SCRIPTURE
a)
The primary purpos=
e of the
Bible is salvation. The Bible=
is
God’s revelation of Himself to man.&=
nbsp;
It is exhaustive in that it contains only what God chose to reveal t=
o us
about Himself. It is sufficie=
nt in
that is all that is necessary to truly know God and His plan for mankind. It contains all that we need to kn=
ow
about God and His purposes for us; if it does not then the Bible cannot be
trusted to be infallible.
b)
An uncovering, bri=
nging to
light, of that which had previously been wholly hidden or only obscurely se=
en.
c)
Revelation – new truth directly communicated= by an act of God.
Inspiration – truth revealed directly to the= mind of the writer by God.
Illumination – truth revealed directly to the heart by the Holy Spirit.
d)
None, as God no longer speaks to us in this manner= . God speaks to us today solely thro= ugh the conduit of illumination. = There is no divine revelation occurring in this age. It ended, according to Ephesians 2= :20 and other passages, with the death of the apostles and prophets, and with t= he close of the canon. A close inspection of the NT will reveal that even in t= hose times revelations, signs, and wonders were fading away.
e)
The Scriptures (in their original handwritten form) are/were free from error and correspond at every point to what is true, whe= ther it be theological, historical, or scientific in nature. This quality is claimed only for t= he original manuscripts and not their copies or translations. For those (including our current B= ible versions) we say are infallible: meaning that the Scriptures are trustworthy in that they in no way lead us = away from true doctrine or practice. We do not separate inerrancy and infallibility. Inspiration leads to Inerrancy whi= ch leads to Infallibility.
f)
Rule or measuring rod. In reference to Scripture it means= the collection of books which were measured to be both authentic and authoritat= ive (Inspired).
g)
The Apocrypha (and other extant literature) was me= asured and found to be less than inspired. This does not infer that they cannot be helpful and even true in the= ir own right, but they should not be understood to be ‘God-breathed’. M= easure was made on the basis of 1) The authority of the author, 2) Internal eviden= ce of Inspiration, 3) The opinions of the early church.
Specific to the Apocrypha, its twelve books were n= ever accepted by the Jews or Christ. They were revered but not considered Scripture.
h)
Translations of the Bible are of immeasurable use = to the serious believer. They are gi= fts from God to believers in our time. But with great blessing always comes great responsibility. No translation is perfect… n= ot the KJV, not the NASB, not the NIV. There are details and nuances that NO English Bible could ever pick = up from Ancient Hebrew or NT Greek. Therefore, the best option is to be aware of what makes each transla= tion different, and ease them in tandem for serious study.
Examples:
Beauty and accuracy – King James Version (or= the New KJV)
High Accuracy – New American Standard Bible<= /p>
Readability / Middle of the Road – New International Version
High Readability – New Living Translation.= p>
i)
No, not really.&n= bsp; While there is some validity to views such as adaptation of species, etc. Evolution is so detrimen= tal because it removes God from the equation.&= nbsp; Foundationally, it removes God from His rightful position as the Gre= at Cause and seeks to explain life apart from any involvement from Him.
Assuming a normal interpretation of Scripture, evo= lution has no place in the grand design.
j)
“Inerrancy means that when all the facts are known, the Scriptures in their original autographs and properly interpreted will be shown to be wholly true in everything they teach, whether that teac= hing has to do with doctrine, history, science, geography, geology, or other disciplines or knowledge.”[i] There are apparent contradictions i= n some places in Scripture, but to suggest that there are errors in the Bible is to impugn the character of God. = Almost all of the contradictions presented are easily answered by in-depth study.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Those few that are not as easily answered are almost always chalked up to errors in transcription/ translati= on and are not in danger of misrepresenting any doctrine. We should remember that only the original manuscripts are inspired. Our copies, while no less true, are inerrant due to derived inspirat= ion.
3)
THE TRINITY
a)
God is both unity and plurality.
2 Corinthians
Matthew 28:19 – Go therefore and make discip= les of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and t= he Holy Ghost. NASB
Deuteronomy 6:4 – Hear, O
b)
It is difficult for the finite to understand the infinite, if not altogether impossible.&nb= sp; The Bible (OT and NT) teaches that God the Father, God the Son, and = God the Holy Spirit are all divine, all are fully and eternally God. They are distinct. Yet there is one God.
c)
i)
God’s own speech hints toward the doctrine o=
f the
Trinity. “Then God said,
‘Let us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness” (Gene=
sis
ii) Salvation?
Without the doctrine of the Trinity, there would b=
e no
salvation. If Jesus were not =
God,
then there was no redemption at
iii)<=
span
style=3D'font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> The work of the Church?
Without the Holy Spirit the Church would be in sad=
shape
indeed. He is ‘God with
us’ and our ‘Comforter’ (John
d)
No. = They are all divine, and there is but one God. While they each have differing offices and functions, to say that on= e is subordinate to another is contrary to Scripture and destroys the unity and oneness of the Godhead.
e)

=
4)
PERSON OF GOD
a)
The study of religious faith, practice, and experi= ence; especially as it relates to the study of God and His relation to the world.=
b)
i)
Belief in the existence of one God viewed as the creative source of man and the world who transcends yet is immanent in the world.
ii) Deism.
The belief that an impersonal God created the worl= d then divorced Himself from the human race leaving man alone to fend for himself. God’s transcen= dence is acknowledged, but his immanence is not.
iii)<=
span
style=3D'font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> Atheism.
The disbelief in the existence of deity.
c)
“I AM THAT I AM” – Exodus
The words of God, spoken to Moses from the bush, s= ignify ‘I AM, I WAS, I SHALL BE.’&nbs= p; God is totally independent of all other things and beings for His existence and all he does. He= re He is revealed as the God who not fail to keep His promises because nothing can change Him, since everything depends on Him.
d)
John
Hebrews
1 John 1:5b – God is Light, and in Him there= is no darkness at all. NASB
1 John 4:8 – The one who does not love does = not know God, for God is love. NA= SB
e)
Holiness, Righteousness and Justice, Goodness and = Mercy, Truth
f)
Omnipresence, omnipotence, omniscience, immutabili= ty
g)
God is not capable of, or susceptible to, change.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Neither His purposes nor His promi= ses change. He is absolute perfec= tion.
h)
First, He is self-existent. He does not rely on any force or o= utside influence to prove or maintain His existence. That being said, here are several classic arguments for His existence…
Cosmologi= cal Argument. (the Watchmaker Argument). God is the Great C= ausal Agent. Because there is somet= hing instead of nothing, God must there exist.&= nbsp; .” How can there= be a watch without a Watchmaker? H= ow can there be a creation without a Creator?
Teleologi= cal Argument. (the Intellegent Design Argument)= . Design supposes a Designer. The created order shows intelligent design, purpose, and harmony, therefore there must be an intelligent, purposeful, and harmonious Master Architect behind it.
Anthropol= ogical Argument. Man, God’s highest order of creation, is not simply a physical being, but also a moral being will conscience, intellect, emotion, and will. The imago dei= (image of God in man) is spiritual, not physical. Lewis Sperry Chafer writes, “= ;There are philosophical and moral features in man’s constitution that which= may be traced back to find their origin in God… A blind force… could never produce a man with intellect, sensibility, will, conscience, and inhe= rent belief in a Creator”[ii]= a>
Moral Arg= ument. Sometimes associated with the Anthropological Argument. Since man knows the difference bet= ween right and wrong there must be a God. A sense of morality cannot come from simple evolutionary processes.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> Romans 2:14-15 indicates that for Gentiles who have no revelation of the law still have an inner, moral witne= ss placed there by God. God has written Himself on our heart.
Ontologic= al Argument. In contrast to = the above inductive arguments, this philosophical argument states that: ‘= If man could conceive of a Perfect God who does not exist, then he could conce= ive of someone greater than God himself which is impossible. Therefore God exis= ts.’ The argument rests on the fact tha= t all men have an awareness of God. Therefore because the concept of God is universal, God Himself must = have placed that idea within man.
i)
Elohim – plural = form meaning “plural of majesty.”&n= bsp; Used over 2,000 times as a general name for God.
Adonai – “Lord” or “Master.” Occurs 449 times.
Yahweh – “LORD” or “Jehovah”. The pr= oper name of God, His covenant name. So sacred to the Israelite/Jewish nation that it is never written or pronounce= d, instead YHWH is used.
5)
PERSON and WORK OF CHRIST
a)
i)
Means “anointed One.”
ii) Jesus
The proper name of the Lord. Is the Greek form of the Hebrew hame: Joshua.
Means “saviour.”
iii)<=
span
style=3D'font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> Immanuel
“God with us.”
iv) Lord
A title of dignity and honor acknowledging the pow= er and authority of the one so addressed. <= /span>
b)
Christ is referred to with divine names. He is called God (John 1:1; Hebrews 1:8). He is also called the Son of God numerous places in Scripture. He is called Lord.
Christ is
ascribed divine worship. =
And
since the Scriptures recognize worship as being due to God alone, then Chri=
st
must therefore be God. Matthew
Christ po=
ssesses
the qualities and properties of deity.=
Pre-existence (John
Divine of=
fices
are ascribed to Him. He i=
s the
Creator (John 1:3); He is the upholder of all things (Col. 1:17); He has the
right to forgive sins (2:5-10); He raised men from the death (John
Christ po=
ssesses
divine attributes. Omnipo=
tence
(Matthew 28:18); Omniscience (John
Christ= 217;s name is coupled with that of God the Father. This occurs in the Apostolic Bened= iction in 2 Corinthians 13:14, the Baptismal Formula of Matthew 28:19 and Acts 2:3= 8, as well as other passages such as John 14:23 and 2 Thessalonians 2:16,17. <= /p>
c)
The deity of Christ and His eternality (or
pre-existence) is inseparably linked.
You cannot have one without the other. John 1:1 says “In the beginn=
ing
was the Word…”, but a better rendering from the Greek changes t=
his
to read “In the beginning the Word was continually existing.” Later in John, Christ claims to ha=
ve
existed before Abraham, “Before Abraham was, I AM” (
d)
Begotten means “to produce especially as an =
effect
or outgrowth” or to “be procreated.” Therefor we
cannot say that He was begotten as God, or we would be denying His
pre-existence and ultimately his deity.&nb=
sp;
Instead, his HUMANITY was begotten.=
Christ was God from all eternity (Micah 5:2), but at
Only-begotten suggests that Christ is “unique,” “the only one of His kind.” It is used to mark out Jesus uniqu= ely above all earthly and heavenly beings.&nbs= p;
e)
“I and the Father are One” (John
“The Father is greater than I” (John <=
st1:time
Hour=3D"14" Minute=3D"28" w:st=3D"on">14:28) does not nullify or
contradict the previous statement.
This is called the Arien Heresy, and
Jehovah’s Witnesses fall into the trap of misinterpreting this verse =
by
assuming it to say that Christ is lesser than God and therefore not God.
f)
An appearance before the incarnation of the second Person of the Trinity (i.e. an appearance of Christ in human form in the Old Testament). The most notable = of these occurs in Genesis 32:23-32 when Jacob wrestles with the Angel of the Lord.
g)
The hypostatic union is a theological explanation = of what happened when Christ became man. Was He God with a human nature or man with a Godly nature? Actually, neither. He was 100% God and 100% man. He did not simply dwell in a human person but instead was the union of two natures in one theanthropic Person (the God-man). This un= ion is eternal… Christ did not simply take this form on earth, but became the God-man forever.
h)
This is one of the most important doctrines in the Bible. If Christ was not virg= in born, then He was not sinless. Should Christ have been born of Joseph, he would have possessed a sin nature.
i)
If Jesus were only a man, then He could not have d= ies to save the world. An attack on = the deity of Christ is an attack on the bedrock of Christianity. Because of his status as God, Chri= st’s death had infinite value whereby He could die for the entire world.
j)
Deism is the belief that God is not personally inv= olved with the universe, though He may have created it. Pantheism is the belief that God i= s coextensive with the universe, i.e. the universe IS God. These differ from orthodox Christianity in that they deny the existence of a personal deity.
k)
Christ is building His church. He is forming, guiding, and controlling the church. He is nurturing and cleansing it.<= span style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> He is also giving gifts to it, administered by the Holy Spirit.
Christ is= praying for believers. He is assu= ring the security of our salvation, restoring us to fellowship when it is broken through sin, and preparing a heavenly home for us. He is producing fruit in our lives= .
6)
PERSON and WORK OF THE HOLY SPI=
RIT
a)
The study of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit.
b)
When He is called the Spirit of God, that meant th=
at He
is the Person of God. 1 Corin=
thians
He has di=
vine
attributes. Life (Romans =
8:2);
Omniscience (1 Corinthians 12:32); Love (Galatians 5:22); and Truth (John
He does d=
ivine
works. Creation (Genesis =
1:2);
Generating Christ (Matthew
c)
His attri=
butes. Intellect (1 Corinthians His works=
. Teaching (John His posit=
ion. He can be Grieved (Isaiah 63:10);
Blasphemed (Matthew d) The Holy Spirit regenerated believers in the Old
Testament (Ezekiel 36:25-27). He
selectively indwellent believers (John e) Baptizing=
–
the work whereby the Spirit places the believer into union with Christ and =
into
union with other believers in the body of Christ (1 Corinthians Indwellin=
g –
the unique ministry of the Holy Spirit (John Gifts=
–
a divine endowment of a special ability for service upon a member of the Bo=
dy
of Christ. Sealing <=
/b>–
the act in which the believer is sealed with the Spirit to identify the
believer as belonging to God. Like
the branding of cattle, it is an act of owenership. Filling=
b>
– the only conditional ministry of the Spirit. It is the experiential and repeated
process by which believers are empowered for service. f) To deny the personality of the Holy Spirit is to d=
eny
his deity. The Holy Spirit is=
not
just an influence but a Person. g) Although speaks of quenching and grieving as being=
sins
against the Holy Spirit, normally it is the blaspheming of the Holy Spirit =
that
one has in mind when this topic arises (Mark 3:28-29). Much has been said on the topic of=
the
‘unpardonable sin’. The
sin of blasphemy is not the sin of belief.=
The sin against the Spirit was final and unforgivable because they h=
ad
the witness and the works of Christ (Matthew 12). We must keep in mind these things =
(1) the nature of the sin is to ascribe what is the obvious wor=
k of
the Holy Spirit (e.g., releasing people from Satan’s power) to Satan
himself; (2) it is not simply a momentary doubt or sinful attitude, but is
indeed a settled condition which opposes the Spirit’s work, as typifi=
ed
by the religious leaders who opposed Jesus; and (3) a person who is concern=
ed
about it has probably never committed this sin, for those who commit it here
(i.e., the religious leaders) are not in the least concerned about Jesus=
217;
warning. h) Romans12:6-8; 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, 28-30; Ephesi=
ans
4:11 i) These gifts are given to believers (1 Corinthians =
j) Volumes have been written on the answer to this
question. And yet, it is still
argued. Personally, I believe=
that
not all gifts are valid for the Church today, and I further believe that the
Scripture gives ample systematic support for this view. Some gifts were meant specifically for the beginni=
ng of
the Church. Apostles and prop=
hets
are said to have been given for the founding era of the body of Christ
(Ephesians We must draw a line in the sand and remind ourselv=
es
that much of the New Testament was not written directly to us. It was written to believers in the=
first
century and contains admonitions and guidance written directly to them in m=
any
instances, not us (i.e. many of the Pauline Epistles). This does not mean we cannot trans=
fer
and infer to our own culture, but we must do so with a watchful eye to the
entire context of Scripture and the revelation of the whole, not the part.<=
/p>
That being said, here are some bullet points that =
must
be stated: · =
Pentecost was a one-time-never-to-be-repeated
event. Pentecost completes
Christ’s finished work for our salvation. · =
The book of Acts is unique, and as an histor=
ical
narrative seeks to document a completed history, a unique epoch in the hist=
ory
of redemption whereby the apostolic spread of the gospel is taken to the en=
ds
of the earth. · =
Even in Acts and the Pauline Epistles there =
is
no uniform nature to the experiences. · =
The Prophetic gifts (Prophecy and its
assessment, tongues and their interpretation, the word of wisdom, and the w=
ord
of knowledge) have ceased. To
believe otherwise is to call into question the canonicity of the New Testam=
ent. If the canon is closed, then how c=
an God
continue to give revelation to man? · =
The office of Apostle, Prophet, and Healer h=
ave
ceased along with the divinely given ability to perform them as a function =
of a
Spirit-gifting. These ‘=
sign
gifts’ are no longer necessary in this later part of the dispensation=
. For the one whom still disbelieves, let us speak t=
o more
practical issues. If the New
Testament was written by men who exercised these sign gifts, why then should
they say that they had ceased.
Further, the New Testament Apostles expected the Lord to return in t=
heir
lifetime, therefore we should not expect them to make any statement about t=
he
cessation of certain gifts. T=
his
being the case, we would have to find a contemporary of the Apostles, who l=
ived
longer than the Apostles and wrote about giftings, if
we are to more fully answer the question of the cessation of gifts. Fortunately, both Hebrews and Jude=
fit
this description. All in all,
Hebrews 2:3-4 seems to involve some solid inferences that the sign gifts had
for the most part ceased. Further, it offers equally inferential evidence of
the purpose of the sign gifts: to confirm that God was doing something new.=
The
whole argument of Hebrews rests on this assumption: there is a new and final
revelation in Jesus Christ If the Spirit of God, the Spirit of truth and orde=
r, is
really restoring these prophetic gifts to the church today in such a widesp=
read
way, would there be, as there in fact is, such widespread ambiguity and
confusion, not to mention division, about them? Does the Spirit, who gives gifts to
unify and edify, work in this ambivalent and uncertain way? I could write more, but Dr. Dan Wallace already
has! Visit http://www.netbibl=
e.org/docs/soapbox/continu.htm k) Galatians 5:22,23 – Love, joy, peace, patien=
ce,
kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. l) Assuming a Normative, Dispensational view of the
Scriptures: No, they are not meant to be practiced today. For more information, refer to Sec=
tion 6
Part j. m) He gives gifts, He fills, He teaches, He guides, He
gives assurance, He prays. 7)
ATONEMENT a) At-one-ment. The state of being at one or recon=
ciled.
The means by which the guilt-punishment chain produced by violation of
God’s will is broken. b) The plan originated with God, revealed to His peop=
le
most clearly in Genesis 22:8 when God provided Abraham a lamb in place of I=
saac
on c) The atonement teaches us that our God is a god con=
cerned
with reconciliation. He draws=
His
own unto Himself. God was/is =
a faithful,
holy covenant partner to His people; He provided the means of atonement when
His sanctuary or the land became defiled, or when the people were
unfaithful. God did not need
appeasement; rather, atonement removed the sinful barrier to the covenantal=
relationship. d) Yes. The
atonement came as a result of God’s love for us. It was absolutely necessary because of God’s love for us=
. e) The atonement teaches us that man is sinful and
therefore separated from the Holy God of the Universe. It teaches us that we cannot become
sinless or bridge that gap ourselves, there must be a mediator. f) No. =
No one
other than could have made a complete and acceptable atonement. The Old Testament sacrificial syst=
em did
not provide a lasting atonement for the Israelites; it had to be repeated
yearly. Only a perfect sacrif=
ice,
where one stood in our stead and died, could satisfy and pay for the penalt=
y of
sin. g) Propitiation is a facet of the atonement. Propitiation means that the death =
of
Christ fully satisfied all the righteous demands of God toward the Sinner.<=
span
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> i.e. God is propitiated – His
holiness is vindicated and satisfied by the death of Christ. h) Redemption is one of the most amazing concepts in =
the
Scripture. Redemption is the
purchasing back of something that had been lost, by the payment of a
ransom. The debt against us i=
s not
merely seen as cancelled, but because of Christ’s atoning work is ful=
ly
paid. i) The most obvious sign that His atoning work was
acceptable is the resurrection of Christ.&=
nbsp;
His coming back to life on the third day was a sign of vindication a=
nd
approval. Romans 3:24-25 tell=
s us
that “Yet now God in his gracious kindness declares us not guilty. He=
has
done this through Christ Jesus, who has freed us by taking away our sins. F=
or
God sent Jesus to take the punishment for our sins and to satisfy God’=
;s
anger against us. We are made right with God when we believe that Jesus shed
his blood, sacrificing his life for us. God was being entirely fair and just
when he did not punish those who sinned in former times.” j) Limited A=
tonement
– the atonement of Christ is limited to a definite or particular numb=
er
of people (the Elect). Unlimited
Atonement – Christ died for every person but His death is effecti=
ve
only in those who believe the gospel. Universal
Atonement – Christ died for the sins of the entire world, and
therefore all men are saved. Christ died for all. 2 Peter 2:1 seems to infer th=
at
unlimited atonement is the correct answer to the question. Though one cannot be dogmatic on t=
his
doctrine, Unlimited Atonement offers the most solution and creates the numb=
er
of problems in relation to the text. k) The Atonement: no.
General Revelation: yes. l) Without the shedding of blood, there is no remissi=
on for
sins (Matthew 26:28). The blo=
od of
Christ is the guarantee of our secured salvation in the New Covenant. 8)
JUSTIFICATION a) To justify is to declare righteous the one who has=
faith
in Jesus Christ. It is a forensic (legal) act of God whereby He declares the
believing sinner righteous on the basis of the blood of Christ. b) Romans 5:1-10 c) A believer in Christ is justified on the basis of =
the
death of Christ, apart from works. d) “It is the judicial act of God, by which he
pardons all the sins of those who believe in Christ, and accounts, accepts,=
and
treats them as righteous in the eye of the law, i.e., as conformed to all i=
ts
demands. In addition to the pardon of sin, justification declares that all =
the
claims of the law are satisfied in respect of the justified. It is the act =
of a
judge and not of a sovereign. The law is not relaxed or set aside, but is
declared to be fulfilled in the strictest sense; and so the person justifie=
d is
declared to be entitled to all the advantages and rewards arising from perf=
ect
obedience to the law.”[iii] e) Regeneration is the “new birth.” It is God’s act of begetting
eternal life in the one who believes in Christ. Justification is a change of a leg=
al nature:
God declares one righteous.
Regeneration is the communication of divine life to the soul...as the
impartation of a new nature...or heart...and the production of a new creati=
on. f) (a)&=
nbsp;
The pardon and removal of all sins (b)&=
nbsp;
The end of separation from God. (c)&=
nbsp;
Imputation of Christ’s righteousness upon the
believing person. g) Romans 9)
RESURRECTION a) The resurrection of Christ is of cardinal
importance. “If Christ =
was
not raised, then all our preaching is useless, and your trust in God is
useless. And if Christ has not been raised, then your faith is useless, and=
you
are still under condemnation for your sins” (1 Corinthians b) Jesus is the Lord of both the physical and
spiritual. He held power over=
life
and death. c) Daniel 12:2 – “And many of them that s=
leep
in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to
shame and everlasting contempt.” Psalm Isaiah 26:19 – “Thy dead men sh=
all
live, together with my dead body shall they arise. Awake and sing, ye
that dwell in dust: for thy dew is as the dew of herbs, and the earth
shall cast out the dead. Job 19:25-27 – “For I know tha=
t my
redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the
latter day upon the earth; and though after my skin worms destroy this body,
yet in my flesh shall I see God: whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes
shall behold, and not another; though my reins be consumed within
me.” d) There will be a continuity between mortal and immo=
rtal
body, just as there was with Christ’s. Our resurrection bodies will be
spiritual in that they are created, indwelt, and sustained by the Holy Spir=
it
and will belong to the eternal, imperishable, immortal, heavenly order of
things. e) Of course.
Paul answered this question in 1 Corinthians 15:35-49. f) They are inseparably linked (1 Corinthians g) John 6:39,40,44; 1 Corinthians 15:22-23; 1 Thessal=
onians
4:14-17 h) See above.
John 5:28. 10)
REGENERATION a)&n=
bsp;
Define soteriology. b)&n=
bsp;
Define regeneration. c)&n=
bsp;
Give two passages of Scripture that teach the neces=
sity
o of man being regenerated. d)&n=
bsp;
How are the Holy Spirit and Scripture involved in
regeneration? e)&n=
bsp;
How can one come to a personal assurance of
regeneration? f)&n=
bsp;
How would you lead a person into salvation? g)&n=
bsp;
Which of the following characteristics must be pres=
ent
in an individual before regeneration can occur: faith; forgiving spirit;
repentance; love; patience; conviction; confession? h)&n=
bsp;
What are some of the manifestations of regeneration=
? i)&n=
bsp;
Describe the faith that results in regeneration. j)&n=
bsp;
What is meant by the terms “old man” and
“new man”? 11)
SANCTIFICATION a) He made people able to serve (Judg=
es